Friday, April 25, 2014

Fees In Mutual Funds


Mutual Fund Fees

Mutual funds are the most popular choice for diversified funds in today's marketplace (though ETFs are fast on the rise, and MLP’s, REITS, BDC’s can be better due to having both dividend and value growth potential). However, for all of their popularity, some investors still do not fully understand the fee structure and all of the possible charges that can be associated with investing in one of these products, and this is what I would like to share with you this week.

•Expense Ratio: The most obvious and up-front cost, an expense ratio or management fee, is paid each year to the fund's management team out of the fund's assets. The average mutual fund charges 1.3% to 1.5% each year, which can add up quickly and eat up your position over time.  When stated as a percentage of assets, average fees do look low — a little over 1% of assets for individuals and a little less than one-half of 1% for institutional investors. But the investors already own those assets, so investment management fees should really be based on what investors are getting in the returns that managers produce. Calculated correctly, as a percentage of returns, fees no longer look low. Do the math. If returns average, say, 8% a year, then those same fees are not 1% or one-half of 1%. They are much higher — typically over 12% for individuals and 6% for institutions.

•Transaction Fees: Most funds will charge a fee when making your initial purchase and some will also charge a redemption fee, which comes when you sell the fund. Both of these fees are paid to the fund, making them different charges than the next two items on our list.

•Front-end Load: This is a fee charged at the purchase of some funds; it is paid to the brokers that sell you the product. A front load is usually charged as a percentage and comes out of your initial investment. If you were to buy $10,000 worth of a fund that charged a 3% front-end load, $300 would go to the broker, while $9,700 would actually be invested.

•Back-end Load: This works the same way as a front-end fee, but it is charged when you sell certain funds. Back-end fees typically taper off as time goes on; for example, the fund can charge 3% if you sell within one year, 2% within two years and so on. These typically won't hurt a long-term investor, but they can be a nasty surprise if you need to exit a position earlier than anticipated.

A no-load fund sells its shares without a commission or sales charge. Some in the mutual fund industry will tell you that the load is the fee that pays for the service of a broker choosing the correct fund for you. According to this argument, your returns will be higher because the professional advice put you into a better fund. There is little to no evidence that shows a correlation between load funds and superior performance. In fact, when you take the fees into account, the average load fund performs worse than a no-load fund.

•Account Fees: Certain companies will charge investors an account fee, which is a cost associated with the maintenance of an account. These include necessities such as postage, record keeping, customer service, cappuccino machines, etc. Some funds are excellent at minimizing these costs while others (the ones with the cappuccino machines in the office) are not.

• The last part of the ongoing fee (in the United States anyway) is known as the 12B-1 fee. This expense goes toward paying brokerage commissions and toward advertising and promoting the fund. That's right, if you invest in a fund with a 12B-1 fee, you are paying for the fund to run commercials and sell itself!

  Not all mutual funds will incur the aforementioned fees, and there are plenty of options that manage these costs quite well. Still, investors should watch out for the fee structure associated with any mutual funds they purchase and be sure that they understand the costs associated with the investment. If a fund has a fee structure that you are not comfortable with, try looking into ETF’s, REITS, MLP’s & BDC’s, those products are often more cost effective and still offer most of the advantages associated with mutual funds, to include dividend growth and greater value growth potential.

Happy Investing

Suburbantrader.info

Disclaimer:  Suburban Trader is a publisher of financial news and opinions and NOT a securities broker/dealer or an investment adviser.  You are responsible for your own investment decisions.  All information contained in our newsletters or on our web site(s) should be independently verified with the companies mentioned, and readers should always conduct their own research and due diligence.

Monday, April 7, 2014

Rip Offs


I’ve shared with people that I talk to for years that I thought that the typical 401(K) plan was a rip-off, a path to mediocrity.  One important key to investing is to monitor your investment expenses and if you begin to look into your 401 (K) holdings that would be an excellent place to start.  For most of you that don’t know that not only are 401 (K)’s predominantly mutual funds, but that mutual funds normally offer two types of shares and they are Institutional and Retail shares.  The main differences between the two are the fees.  In the event you make the wrong choice on which ones to purchase you can say goodbye to huge amounts of your money. 

   There is a case going on at the Supreme Court in Washington that involves $3.8 billion in assets and some 20,000 folk that would like to retire.  The goal of the court is to decide whether the plan’s sponsor, EDISON INTERNATIONAL (NYSE: EIX), is at fault for purposely putting its employees in high-free retail shares in order to slash the company’s administrative costs by $8 million.

   Why is the Supreme Court interested in this case you ask?  Mainly because what has happened at Edison, happens across the financial world daily.  Unsuspecting investors subsidize the wealth of the well-informed.  The uneducated investors believe that the “institutional” shares sound like something that only the likes of a Goldman Sachs or a Berkshire Hathaway have access to, however that idea is completely false.  In the case for many funds, the only qualifying factor is the minimum investment.  There are some retail shares that may have a minimum investment as low as $500, however, if you have $10,000 to invest (and sometimes less), you can get the so-called institutional shares.  The shares and the management of the shares are the same but the differences in the fees are huge.  The Oxford Club uncovered one that had a low 0.05% in annual fee for its institutional shares but the ones that purchased the retail shares were hit with a 0.17% in management fees.  As you see over the course of your investing towards retirement the compounded difference is tens of thousands of dollars.

   The writers of the Oxford Club were given access recently to an eye opening report prepared by some of the nation’s top financial scholars.  Professors Ian Ayres of Yale Law School and Quinn Curtis of University of Virginia just released a paper called “Beyond Diversification: The pervasive Problem of Excessive Fees and Dominated Funds in 401 (K) plans.”  A full 16% of the plans the duo studied had fees so high that “young investors would be better off forgoing tax benefit and investing in stand-alone funds.”  This is what we at Suburban Trader suggest then set up a Trust Fund.  Even worse, they saw that several plans offer mutual funds with negative guaranteed interest rates.  It is amazing what a little research can turn up, so many people have 401 (K)’s that have fees that are so exorbitant that the supposed tax savings are destroyed.  Fees are so high that the only person getting rich from the plans are the folks selling the mutual funds.  If you like your 401 (K) fine, but do some research of your own and look at some low cost options.

Great Investing.

Disclaimer:  Suburban Trader is a publisher of financial news and opinions and NOT a securities broker/dealer or an investment adviser.  You are responsible for your own investment decisions.  All information contained in our newsletters or on our web site(s) should be independently verified with the companies mentioned, and readers should always conduct their own research and due diligence.